Comments: Spent some time using this before I got a HTML5 Builder.Found it to be a good alternative.Pros: I like the fact that this is a free software that can cope with creating HTML pages with their editor.You can choose a paid software for this task, but you don't have to. BlueGriffon allows you to make sites with code, and it is also easy to use.Cons: I would love more features. The program is lightweight so it can be used on older systems, but also because it has fewer features than their paid competitors.
.While some designers developed workflows completely based around manual editing of raw HTML files, the WYSIWYG (what you see is what you get) editor began to emerge as a tool of empowerment to millions of amateur and professional designers who didn't know, or at least hadn't mastered, the art of hypertext markup.Products like CoffeeCup, HotDog, FrontPage, GoLive, and many others filled the market, and many web-based WYSIWYG editors emerged as well. Among the more successful was Macromedia (later Adobe) Dreamweaver, which was among my personal favorites for many years.These web authoring tools weren't just about WYSIWYG editing; even for those who were comfortable with direct authoring of markup language, these tools offered advantages with template control, file management, and simply reducing the time it takes to create functional code.But just as these helpful editors were expanding access to webpage creation, something else was happening too. Content management systems like Drupal and WordPress (and many, many others before them) displaced the need for the average content producer to need to edit raw HTML at all. You could easily make a functional website without even worrying about the underlying markup.So did the rise of the content management system change the web? Did it eliminate the need to hand code HTML?
BlueGriffon is a WYSIWYG content editor for the World Wide Web. One-Click Templates Manager with 2,500 free templates; Mobile Viewer; EyeDropper,.
Well, for some people, yes. But as the web moved from a collection of content to a platform for applications, just as many new opportunities have arisen for doing markup. Every software as a service application, every social media network, and even many mobile applications rely on HTML and CSS to render their display. And those content management systems? They still need templates to function.And though many helpful libraries exist to standardize and simplify the web development process, coding for the web isn't being displaced any time soon.
Proprietary tools are still common, but there is a rich collection of open source alternatives out there. Here are some you should consider.
BlueGriffonis an open source WYSIWYG editor powered by Gecko, the rendering engine developed for Mozilla Firefox. One of a few derivatives of NVU, a now-discontinued HTML editor, BlueGriffon is the only actively developed NVU derivative that supports HTML5 as well as modern components of CSS. If your goal is to write as little actual HTML as possible, then BlueGriffon is the tool you want. It's a true drag-and-drop WYSIWYG website designer, and even includes a dual view option so you can see the code behind your design, in case you want to edit it or just learn from it.It also supports the EPUB ebook format, so you don't have to just publish to the web: you can provide your readers with a download of your content that they can take with them. Licensed under the MPL, GPL, and LGPL, a version of BlueGriffon is available for Linux, Windows, and Mac.
Aptana Studiois an 'open source development tool for the open web' which, in practice, means it's more of an advanced IDE specializing in web development. Based on the open source Eclipse project, Aptana Studio features tools for assisting in HTML and CSS authoring, including code coloring and completion, debugging, and outlining of documents. Its main selling point is its JavaScript support, making it a strong tool for developing more complex web applications. NetBeansis a widely used software development platform for building web, mobile, and desktop applications with Java, JavaScript, HTML5, and more. It has been supported by Oracle (and its predecessor, Sun) since 1999, and in October 2016 moved to the Apache Foundation for open governance, and simplified and streamlined community contributions.
Netbeans isn't exactly a drag-and-drop web design application, but it's a robust web-aware IDE. It's a great choice if you're developing web apps, or if you just enjoy coding for the web. SeaMonkeyis a community continuation of what was once a Mozilla-produced internet application suite. While Mozilla decided to narrow its focus to individual projects, SeaMonkey continues to make regular releases of its full suite, which includes, a simple WYSIWYG HTML editor. You'd struggle to do advanced layouts with Composer (for instance, you can't adjust the CSS display or property to create a two column text and image pair, but would have to use a non-responsive table instead), but for basic pages with zero code written, this is a realistic option. Aloha Editoris a JavaScript-based WYSIWYG HTML5 editor that allows users to edit content in the same layout that readers view it. This is a pretty unique model, as it's not exactly an application itself, but embeds an editor into your HTML page.
It requires a stack, so if you're not a developer familiar with Javascript then it can be difficult to configure. However, if you're a site admin looking for an easy editing interface for your users to make quick updates to their pages, then you should say 'aloha' to Aloha. WordpressThe open source content management service (CMS) and blogging platform, Wordpress, features a structured yet flexible page layout interface. It lets you create blog posts and pages with just enough flexibility to let your creativity thrive, and with just enough restriction to ensure that your creation renders correctly in all browsers. With Wordpress, you can have choose your desired level of complexity at every step. You can self-host it using their method, or you can buy hosting from.
You can use the drag-and-drop designer to create pages, or you can hack on HTML and PHP yourself. You can choose a contributed theme or you can design and create your own. It's a great resource for anyone who wants to run a website.7. Try an advanced text editorWhile not necessarily the best for beginners, a number of text editors provide additional functionality that is incredibly useful to those editing HTML/CSS documents. When used side-by-side with a modern browser with built-in debugging tools, you may be just as productive with one of these as you are with a more dedicated solution. Some of our favorites include:.
describes itself as a 'hackable text editor for the 21st century.' Developed by GitHub, it has support for HTML and CSS out of the box and many additional plugins available. is a JavaScript-based text editor developed by Adobe for web design and frontend development.
It touts its inline editor, live preview, and preprocessor support functions for making it easier to do web design in the browser. Without participating in the holy war between these two traditional text editors, I can safely say that there are a number of enhancements for web editing available for both. So if you're already a terminal junkie, take your pick. Or, if those don't satisfy, try one of these.Are any of these solutions a feature-by-feature reproduction of Dreamweaver or another proprietary tool?
Of course not. They weren't designed to be. They each have had their own roadmap and goals, and their own strengths and weaknesses. Web design is a big world with lots of applications and lots of approaches. Take the time to find the workflow that meets your needs.
Try out a new tool, see what you like and don't like about it, and share your feedback with the broader community in the comments.Are you interested in reading more articles like this? Sign up for our. Call me a traditionalist, but I really believe the only 'right' way to do web design is by typing.(.in Emacs, but I digress.)There's a place for getting a quick webpage online, but in those cases I think it's best to keep it as simple as possible. I say this because I've seen way too many over-designed sites that abuse little hacks in GUI design applications, and it ends up not rendering correctly on browsers, or for screen readers.tl;dr: I don't think GUI designers are bad, just mis-directed. True, what is needed is the integration with development platforms for server-side applications. For my projects I use mostly Netbeans, it's like eclipse / aptana, and all that kind of IDEs. But if i need to fix something really quick and i don't want to wait all the time netbeans or any other IDE takes to fully load, i edit files on vim.
I've used atom, and sublime text. But netbeans auto-completion code, or the control+click link on file includes or methods, are very usefull when your code start to grow in number of methods, and classes. But in my work at the data center, if i have to fix some client codes.
Vim is my tool. I don't believe even Richard Stallman would actually say that Emacs does not fit the definition of open source software. Rather, his position is that he supports his program as Free Software because the open source software movement is not about the principles that he supports.In other words if you asked Richard Stallman if he would characterize Emacs as open source software, his reply would be 'No, it's Free Software.' However, if you asked Richard Stallman if Emacs was technically open source he would say, 'Yes, technically, but it would be more accurate to call it Free Software.' Lately I have been doing more with Drupal and Wordpress where style is controlled by themes (which I edit with a text editor of some sort).These frameworks then contain their own editor tools that can have as much, or as little, options as you include.Like at work I give them some, but not all, formatting tools so as to keep everything within the theme's guidelines, while at home I give more.Of course, for myself I give ALL but that's because I can go into the source and do whatever the heck I want;). This article brings me back to having to deal with other people's Web pages which they made with a WYSIWYG editor. FrontPage's procedurally generated HTML code was truly frightening to behold.
Both Dreamweaver and Netscape Composer (later replaced by Mozilla Composer, which became Seamonkey Composer) generated much cleaner code (I mostly dealt with Mozilla Composer code, but I seem to remember even the original Netscape Composer's code being much better than that from FrontPage).I never understood the attraction to FrontPage because both DreamWeaver and Composer were easier to use, and while Composer was mostly about being easy, DreamWeaver was also more powerful than FrontPage. I guess it was just the Microsoft name that got people using FrontPage. Great roundup!
Thank you.WYSIWYG editors have their place. Yes, it's true most of the web is now managed by content systems, and development is best done in a text editor or IDE. However, for some people, using a wysiwyg editor is the fastest way to bring ideas to life. They want to focus on content and layout, and not html markup.I'll admit it's a while since I've used one of these tools, as I now seem to do most of my HTML authoring with tinyMCE and CKeditor inside Drupal.But, every now and again, I do find I want to conceptualise something quickly. So it's great to have this handy guide. I'm going to have a play with Aptana and Bluegriffon now!Thanks!
For more discussion on open source and the role of the CIO in the enterprise, join us at.The opinions expressed on this website are those of each author, not of the author's employer or of Red Hat.Opensource.com aspires to publish all content under a but may not be able to do so in all cases. You are responsible for ensuring that you have the necessary permission to reuse any work on this site. Red Hat and the Red Hat logo are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries.Copyright ©2019 Red Hat, Inc.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |